Friday, May 4, 2018

Your definition of build quality

How to find your passion - Why you have no passion & How to fix it



Is the thick solid feeling metal Thud doors of high quality materials, including interior As you see in Mercs, Skodas VWS BMW They thud well, but just aren t as reliable as Japanese typical problem areas are electronics, air conditioning, transmission etc. Etc. Not to mention, the maintenance costs are expensive killer You could say they are safer.
Is build quality all about reliability quintessential My OHC Vtec 64,000 kms feels flimsy compared to 50,000 km C220 Buttttttttttttttttttt he finally visited the garage in January 08 for a regular service to 11 months, compared the Merc Auto Hangar which was about 5 times in the same period 4 for repairs Nothing wrong with the Hondas ed damn, most Japs other Toyota vehicles over the Japs cost 2 euros 10 of the option purchase to maintenance repair.
Is the build quality of a Honda Accord Toyota Camry that will 2,00,000 kms with a precise clinical reliability and zero problem or Euro car that will have its fair share of costly maintenance problems, but will give you a sense of solidness you can see parallels across segments.
Swift over the Fabia Civic Altis compared to the Jetta Agreement against the Passat Laura Agreement compared to 3 C A4 LS460 against the S 7 A8 Montero Prado versus X3 Indian prices Landcruiser versus Audi Q7 X5 M Class.



Euro Car Thud solid cost about 8 12 of their price in road maintenance, for a period of 5 years Japanese sedans typically cost 2 4 for the same duration and with a much higher reliability.
My vote is for reliability I respect the Jap precision manufacturing, quality control and the resulting reliability I respect a car that will just work, day after day, year after year without a single problem that is not struggling for time anyway I respect Nature zero problem I see appeal inherent in a car that performs the way it should, every time you take her, for me, is the outstanding quality of construction.
And remember, it is easier to get the thud as the Supreme reliability In fact, the Japanese are increasingly getting stronger generation after generation A Jap with a thud or Euro with the reliability will be a dream become reality.
So what is the build quality for you Remember, I did not ask you if you choose a Euro or a Japanese car is your definition of build quality that I want to know.


Reliability above all else and not a flat out in their cars as the Japanese do.
Build quality happens to be something that happens every time a car is discussed and everyone seems to have its own definition for it - there was something about the why single thread Maruti too.
I googled for the correct definition, but surprisingly turned up nothing useful was surprised that even Wikipedia does not have an article about something that many consider an attribute to have in their car and possibly other also produced.
Only one link I found useful was related to photography Dictionary - Build quality and that was what they had to say the build quality.
The overall quality of the construction, design, etc. A product of how he's built Strength is not an easy or objectively defined concept, but it refers generally to well designed and built the product is actually a subjective point of view This includes factors such as adjustment of the robustness and reliability finish if the product looks smooth and polished or made is rough and ready, quality of materials, etc. If the above definition is anything to go by, I think it is good enough, then build quality covers various areas, it is not only the thud or robustness aka as tank construction but also the same reliability the quality of materials used.



Last edited by supremeBaleno November 25 2008 to 13 42.








Your definition of build quality, your definition, construction, quality.