Thursday, February 15, 2018

The shadow of the "German" of Atrocities 1914 The British Library

BBC Elegance and Decadence Age of the Regency Episode 3 with Lucy Worsley



cropX 21 cropY 73 cropW 1419 cropH 1421 w 96 h 96 96 96 dispW dispH.
CropX 21 cropY 73 cropW 1419 cropH 1421 w 96 h 96 96 96 dispW dispH Angela Carter Wise children.
CropX 42 cropY 20 cropW cropH 579 326 w 224 h 126 224 126 dispW dispH.
CropX cropY 42 20 579 cropW cropH 326 w 224 h 126 224 126 dispW dispH hope Russian revolution, tragedy, Myths witness to a troubled world, shocked and forever changed our Russian Revolution exhibition.
Galleries, Reading Room, Shop opening hours vary and restoration.
The shadow of German Atrocities 1914.


Professor Sophie Schaepdrijver consider how the German atrocities were represented during and after the First World War by the two allied countries and Germany.
The so-called German atrocities in the summer of 1914, when 6,500 civilians were killed by the German army in Belgium and northern France, were hardly impact the larger scale of violence against civilians in WWI world, but they were the war cause cl passionately debated throughout BRE conflict and for decades after.
Portrait of Johannes Jørgensen, a Danish writer who in 1915 published Klokke Roland False witness, describing the German invasion of Belgium in 1914 as a heinous act.
German Atrocities framed the discussion of who was the aggressor in this war and which violates international norms of war in neutral countries, the plight of invaded Belgium, a neutral State which was not party to the rise of tensions in Europe, resonated strongly Klokke Roland False Witness novel by the Danish Catholic convert in 1915 Johannes Jørgensen 1866-1956 deplored the victimization of a small country, the Dutch cartoonist Louis Raemaekers 1869-1956 became an international celebrity with his pictorial denunciations in the Allied camp, reports of massacres of civilians portrayed opponents as beyond the pale of civilized warfare allied charges, although based on real facts, have been adjusted to reflect the wartime propaganda, for example, German soldiers were portrayed as targeting women and children, when in reality, the majority of victims but was then men, the theme of women and children massacred appeals to the sense of men of chivalry and so support ed military mobilization Belgian poster artist Gisbert Combaz 1869-1941 depicts the victims of the massacre Leuven as mothers and young children the theme of women and child victims traveled to other theaters of a poster aimed to rally behind the Italians winning back their territory invaded showed cherubs in danger and warning the horrors of Italians Belgium and France are repeated in Veneto invaded As fatigue, the war increased exhortation not to forget the plight of defenseless sought to galvanize the fighting spirit.
Drawing by Belgian artist Gisbert Combaz 1869-1941 showing the people of Leuven, Belgium fleeing the city August 25, 1914, German soldiers burned the city after killing hundreds of civilians.



Ruthless lithography by Belgian artist Gisbert Combaz 1869-1941 It shows death as a German commander on the submarine turret that torpedoed the Lusitania.
This is your Villain lithography work by Belgian artist Gisbert Combaz 1869-1941 It depicts the death showing Kaiser Wilhelm II a mass grave.
Kochonneries lithography by Belgian artist Gisbert Combaz 1869-1941 kochonneries The word comes from the French word pig, which means pork Using k instead of c and the word pork are satirical references to the Germans.
The barbarians are slaves lithography Belgian artist Gisbert Combaz 1869-1941 It shows a train ride aboard with forced laborers, guarded by German soldiers.
Photo by Belgian artist Gisbert Combaz 1869-1941 showing a crowd on the national holiday July 21, 1916, shouting Long live Belgium.



Poster propaganda, created by Renato Arlotti and Adele Zandrino, showing Germans as barbarians killers 1918.
A booklet and stamps produced by the French League, French-to Remember Remember that aims to perpetuate the memory of German crimes after the war.
If the Allied war propaganda regarding the massacre of 1914 civilians resorted to distortions, his counterpart in Germany was a complete fatuity German war propaganda claimed that, in reality, victims of cruelty had been German troops civilian snipers snipers had led a guerrilla war against German soldiers, cutting the throats of sleeping men and gouging the eyes of those widely circulated fabrications injured, including penny dreadfuls media staged bestial francs-bands shooters and depict the invading army as a tough but fair harbinger order, rightly rejoice in the punishment he inflicted.
Moulin in the Ardennes printed in penny magazines, was a story for the Germans depicting German soldiers who behaves well and selfless.
Within days of the invasion, the Belgian and French boards have documented the killings by interviewing refugees and sending roving reporters before the front has closed late spring of 1915, a British official commission came up with its own , widely circulated report Although not deliberately misleading, it overestimated cruelty to women and children and did not contradict the allegations refugees infused panic, as the story that systematically hacked invasion troops out of the hands of children.
Meanwhile, in May 1915, the German Government has produced its own report on German book White alleged that said the Belgians had conducted a premeditated war s People with sadistic excesses against his army That report was based on publishing hearsay and heavy, failed to show in the German army that contradicts his assertions, and deposits repressed by civilians for the same reason in response, the Belgian government in exile issued a detailed rebuttal that one Belgian gray book called with civilian casualties lists; and Belgian sociologist thesis Fernand van Langenhove invalidated the People's War in its study 1916 growth of a legend who proved on the basis of German documents that the sniper story was a mass delusion, a cycle of myths.



Bryce Committee's report on alleged German atrocities.
Report of the committee headed by Viscount Bryce, assessing alleged German outrages, 1915.
Copyright and Crown copyright under a government license.
And yet, after the defeat of Germany, the Weimar government refused to disavow the old record of war of the imperial army the armistice at the end of the Republic, war and foreign ministries put the propaganda innocentist and investigations hampered military in wartime conduct an attempt to bring war criminals to justice, in Leipzig in 1921, came to nothing Meanwhile, in public opinion in allied British particular, a stream of increasingly the condemnation of the war itself as an atrocity led commentators to indict war propaganda as guilty of atrocity reports and issue in 1928, the British Labor MP Arthur Ponsonby published Falsehood in wartime an act 'atrocity propaganda accusation Robert Graves goodbye to all 1929 mocked the lurid allegations that German soldiers had hung Belgian priests inside made church bells, no allies text has never worn this accusation; it was manufactured by the German war propaganda to discredit the reports of violence against civilians Irony of fate, this peace campaign in the countryside dovetail German refusal that the two agreed that atrocities had been essentially a creation the propaganda war.
The Second World War did not bring new relevance to the issue, as evidenced by the 50th anniversary commemorations in various cities victimized lonely But in the meantime, a Belgian-German commission of historians had established a kingdom of truth and reconciliation by examining critically the German arguments to defend a 1958 study by the German historian Peter Schöller demonstrated the falsity of the white Paper in 1915 in the case of Louvain He did not, however, reverberate widely by German historiography of the invasion in 1914 of France and Belgium a study in 1984 by the German historian Lothar Wieland analyzed the German public opinion and official policy on the issue maverick 1914-1936, finding that the refusal to tolerate war crimes contributed to the success of Nazi propaganda Finally, the vast German study atrocities 1914 by historians John Horne and Alan Kramer, published in 2001, placed the events of summer 1914, and ec ho wartime and post-war culture, as part of the full mobilization of companies for war and after the war the study confirmed that violence against the civilian population was not the result of propaganda and that was a popular war illusion; and he explained why, despite the relatively low number of casualties, these events stood so great in a war that both parties portrayed as a crusade in defense of civilization Publication of this study showed that the decline of passions the war in Europe both the passage of the culture of the crusade, and efforts between the wars to dispel that definitely opened a cultural historical truth of space in which to enter the place of atrocities in the wider history mass mobilization for World war.
Sophie De Schaepdrijver teaches modern European history at Penn State University She has published on military occupations in the First World War, the War of cultures in occupied Belgium, and civilian newspapers She is interested in the intersection between military occupation and individual ambition, she recently finished a book on Gabrielle Petit, a spy for the British general headquarters who was executed in Brussels occupied by the Germans in 1916 at the age of 23, she co-wrote and presented the documentary Brave little Belgium VRT-Canvas, in the fall of 2014 dissemination and exhibition curator historic Bruges exhibition in the German navy domination.



The text of this article is available under the Creative Commons license.








The shadow of the "German" of Atrocities 1914 The British Library, long shadow, German.