Divine inspiration & Biblical inerrancy: Failed Hypothesis
The Discovery Channel is still under heavy criticism for their pseudo-documentary on sharks that never existed, and Sirens Their D News YouTube channel is to have credibility problems and a recent online video host hipster Julian Huguet gushes about a new car that runs saltwater.
After some reasonable basic information on the limits of fossil fuels and the current battery technology, Huguet introduced the concept QUANTITY e-Sportlimousine car it claims can run on salt water, producing only water as a by -is produced no carbon emissions Huguet further explains that if electric cars run clean electricity, the electricity has to come from somewhere, and the United States, it is likely to be a coal burning plant.
All this is correct, but it completely misses critically important point exactly the same problem exists with the QUANTITY e-Sportlimousine.
There was a claim for engines that can run on salt water or freshwater These requests are generally based on hydrogen by electrolysis of water and oxygen, and then using that hydrogen as fuel, burning back with the oxygen to produce energy and water the problem with the use of electrolysis of water as a fuel is thermodynamics, he must take more energy to separate first water you can possibly go back burning hydrogen with oxygen.
The e QUANTITY, however, do not use this method instead, it uses technology nanoflowcell This is basically a battery that uses salt water solutions for storing electrolytes that can undergo reactions to produce electricity.
Liquid electrolytes circulate through two separate cells in which a cold combustion takes place, during which the oxidation and reduction processes occur in parallel and produce power from this electric made to the drive train.
When nanoflowcell battery is low, you can simply replace the liquid electrolyte to recharge the battery in about the same amount of time as filling a gas tank, although you need to fill two tanks of 200 liters each this is an interesting approach, but is not a new concept to the nanoflowcell the company claims a projected range of 400-600km 250-375 miles with a respectable range and recharge fast enough, this kind of technology could make all the electric cars possible for the market in general.
But Huguet suggested that the car would be running on the salt water and would have an advantage over conventional batteries that need to be powered by coal power plants Fluid electrolyte in nanoflowcell would also be charged and this energy should come from somewhere, like a power plant like any other battery.
While nanoflowcell is an interesting approach, and we can see cars with this type of battery in production in the future, this technology is not a solution to our energy needs fluid electrolyte salt water are not fuel They are not a source of energy, they are simply an energy storage medium, like a battery and that energy must come from somewhere.
It seems that the discovery needs to invest in better science writers.
This technology is rejected as a simple and an energy storage solution Then I say, what's wrong with that energy storage is the key to the economy Use renewable wind and solar, store elsewhere, use it when it is dark and quiet that we see in Germany, storage in cars and houses is the solution to distributed renewable energies.
Commentary sunit misses the point of the Stanford experience is very small scale, really only a proof of concept very far from a process used in a vehicle, much less a finished product There is no guarantee that this process will never deliver results on the scale, cost and speed needed to power a vehicle so, in fact, the article is correct facts the hype out of breath on the car driven to salt water hogwash.
Solar requires copper extraction associated with environmental disasters and kills a lot of migratory birds when grouped in a large factory, as well as coal mining and burning for charging batteries associated People should consider the possibility that our no given technology, so it is green, we're fucked either the technology must be developed that technology is low to be profitable, free carbon, renewable, innovative, plentiful, and people have to learn to grow wings.
Well, my electric vehicle runs entirely on sunlight into energy It doesn t reach over 25kph, but I can get a lot more speed and go with a bit more to spend on batteries, I am a retired next month I ride three wheels on solar energy in Canberra to demonstrate our government fu how corrupt and embarassingly back they are in their attitude towards renewable energy.
Your electric vehicle tons of fossil fuels costed to mine, refine, assemble and distribute.
All energy comes from something the gift electric vehicles solar panels t appear just don t grow grass and saltwater vehicles are an attempt to long-term to make a drum sound wacky as cold fusion .
The fluids of salt water electrolyte are no fuel They are not a source of energy, they are simply an energy storage medium, like a battery and that energy must come from somewhere.
At the end of the article, but in the middle of the article also said that Julian is.
The e QUANTITY, however, do not use this method instead, it uses technology nanoflowcell This is basically a battery that uses salt water solutions for storing electrolytes that can undergo reactions to produce electricity.
The important part is the last part of the sentence that the product saltwater solution electricity I do not see where charging other than filling the tank takes place isn t salt water with minerals added some liquid electrolyte.
Not difficult to understand its use as the battery to power an electric motor, then replace lead and the acid in a car battery instead of charging.
No, you are wrong, put fresh sulfuric acid in a battery, it will be fully charged.
The battery works exactly the same as that of a lead-acid battery; it produces a current through the electrochemical reactions and when it is recharged spent by an electrolytic reaction.
The fluid passes, and is in any case not unlike toxic sulfuric acid.
Billyboo Saltwater I feel that much Sá controlled mixture of minerals and the water is only to hold the electrons, they must create the fluid and charge with electricity so that it fits these electrons therefore, electricity has yet to come from somewhere.
This Sá prototype which means you'll never be able to buy, it is to demonstrate the technology that we will never know what it can do without eventually build one, and take on the Test Track, otherwise the roads However, this is a problem in common with the non Tesla it takes longer to recharge than unload, but Sá Supercar people do supercars t drive, because it's not many places we can get up 200 MPH, and they can not really carry anything more than anal, and few people can handle a car at these speeds.
So this is great and all, but it's not going further than Tesla made because the market wants beautiful prototypes and needs getters groceiry This is a business, this car, right there there is a billboard to get some attention but it won t actually go anywhere as long as Sá novelty, and we keep detune economy cars for street racing.
This article has been some confusion regarding relevance I have heard this argument before that an ecological invention is unnecessary due to its inability to solve a problem, it was never intended to solve first.
This article is not an argument against a car in saltwater He Sá diversion of the subject at hand, to my knowledge, the engineers and designers behind the e-Sportlimousine QUANTITY only intended to build a car that ran on saltwater They made this period stating that the car does not resolve a problem, it was never intended to solve is quite useless one could make such an obvious statement, but this kind of negativity tends to make a look like Scrooge technological advances.
The bottom line is that any problem is solvable for those willing to look for the solution Skepticism is valuable in its own way, but only when used properly.
See above after it does not work on seawater It works on chemicals confusion deliberately created by manufacturers in order to attract media attention, it is actually hype.
From what I read it sounds like the car comes with a fueling station fueling station refill the fuel mixture and electrolyte can be used again and again there is no dumping of liquid I also read that it does not use heavy metals and non toxic proof is in the pudding This type of engine might not be great for the average driver, but could be very useful for the locomotive industry, transport, and many others come to mind perhaps the people responsible can set up methane collection systems Many farmers there farms on the cow poop Why not human shit I'm pooping at this time, why waste this energy, why should not I power up my house and car with my shit I paid for food renew the poop.
Your guide on technology 200 years, there is a reason for its limited use today, although it seems that the engine of the car has improved a little.
Step 1 around a stainless steel bowl, an aluminum foil and a paper towel wet step 2 the paper towel with brine and place it in the bowl with a hte sheet of the napkin the paper towel is an insulator between the tank and step sheet 3 have a battery that you charge.
When the voltage drops to replace the towel and re-wet the metal parts Flushing help.
Try other liquids for fun and profit Lye water leech by Pee vinegar campfire ashes.
Try other metals copper, graphite, magnesium, are all good choices a little less common in most households.
The metals specifically an anode and cathode pass through a chemical reaction that produces electricity They eventually wear out and must be replaced Its not free energy is a type of battery more like voltaic cells that was invented around 1800 and was also turned off the salt water he also wasnt charged before use because it does not need to be.
The sun that uses hydrogen as fuel by transforming it into helium by a fusion reaction can supply every human need only flow batteries were used by NASA, GE for years and many companies are experimenting with them most of the time for large-scale power plants solar cells of various kinds could provide all the electricity we need for ever but experts will tell you there is a problem that say stick them in the desert southwest is too near the major coastal cities, etc., and the transmission lines would be too blah blah blah we waste trillions in oil wars and the politicians who really know nothing and just take the money all day and lobbyists say it's ridiculous question of priorities and mental health maybe this car is the real deal or perhaps is not, but yes it does echnically possible costs can be another thing the market, I do not know, I do know Oshinsky developed the nickel hydride battery in Michigan bought by GM and never produced or used in the EV1 because they squelched and Chevron Texaco and sold in 2012 to BASF which still keeps the production they paid 58 million for the single patent rights that was lent to Solectria funded by DARPA Boston ED Sunrise built by a small team of MIT and he set the distance world record for 20 years before EV Elon Musk's Tesla I personally examined in Lowell, Mass a NY Times article October 27, 1997 wrote a story on how the former CEO and GM chairman led to other than the passenger car with four full doors EV Boston to Manhattan and compared to flight Lindburgh well Oshinsky was threatened, everyone was silenced, the battery been returned and we now have lithium batteries that are not answered because there is not enough lithium and is especially Bolivia-57 Tesla can only be a niche player at the Solectria Sunrise could be produced for about 25,000 and had a side reach almost 400 miles with the Toyota battery tried to copy and use their version of the Prius is the most successful replacement of the car on the planet Chevron's PURSUED this too MIT Technology Review recently wrote an article about BASF and the battery nickel hydride saying it could be much better than current lithium batteries, but more research is needed flow cells are real and his great idea, although this car should be checked problem is really that we have a petroleum-based economy for a long time solar liquid in form and rapid changes must be calculated to eliminate things a human time line or the financial system collapses into chaos is not a technical problem, it is how to introduce changes in a system that we have had over 100 years the least offensive of the people I suppose and that true leaders accept the bankers of the oil companies.
As each new invention, it met with a group of skeptics and scientists you all waiting.
Energy production from coal plant to power the cars Eletric crazy everyone to the point where they see disavantage on Eletric cars Someone made a mistake to assume that a Lotus Elise uses less energy than a person with knowledge Tesla Roadster reprimands with excellence.
In the UK alone, the 2005 figures show UK Oil Refineries used over 5,600 GWh The fully charged episode, the so-called surveyed said they used more energy than Coventry and Leicester combined.
But how do you recharge the car then, if salt water is the source of energy you how to recharge your car.
Well, I am the inventor and the original designer of the hydrogen generating device, Miami Hydro Max The Ultimate hydrogen generator My US Patent 8,535,493, issued September 17th, 2013 is the main component of a remarkable discovery, I'm about to give you brief and disclosure of MMH is a generator that is currently installed on my car, a 285 hp 2002 Chevy Avalanche When the electric charge of 12 volts received from the battery, is routed introduced the cell of the MMH device, it breaks the passage of molecules of the comprehensive water into oxygen and hydrogen gas, and then used to power the motor here, some remarkable facts about the effectiveness and the calculation of this device only the energy of the energy efficiency sector output formula 100 facts of useful power of 285 hp the engine on my car b in the total energy to produce hydrogen required depends on what is in the electrolysis of water could be as low as 200 watts, but suppose is about 600-800 watts, and if this circle 6 to 745 watts or 1 hp 745 c 6 watts 1 hp of energy in 1 divided by 285 hp 285 hp 100 x 28500 just sounds impossible.
The engine of my car runs only on the water Miami Hydro Max was switched my truck Chevrolet Avalanche since 2013 and yes I know how it sounds, what is unreal and impossible Well, I have reached the impossible things this remarkable system works only on request and there is no need to pressure holding tank for hydrogen gas in this design.
And one can see cars with this type of battery in production in the future, this technology is not a solution to our energy needs fluids saltwater electrolyte are no fuel They are not an energy source they are just.
Salt water car Not so fast The Skeptics Guide to the Universe, salt, water, rapid.